<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - cairo-perf does not deal with cpus larger then 1024 well."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66783#c1">Comment # 1</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - cairo-perf does not deal with cpus larger then 1024 well."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66783">bug 66783</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>If CPU_SETSIZE doesn't match the value as used by the kernel,
sched_getaffinity() is meant to return -EINVAL. Is that the case on your
system?
I don't think check_cpu_affinity() is particularly relevant when benchmarking,
the impact of thread placement is interesting to study, but it is unclear that
actually suggesting a particular placement is beneficial. So I can either fixup
check_cpu_affinity() to ignore EINVAL or simply move the warning into the
README.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>