<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Segfault sweep_line_delete on video playback (2)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81699#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Segfault sweep_line_delete on video playback (2)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81699">bug 81699</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:sixtysix@inwind.it" title="Massimo <sixtysix@inwind.it>"> Massimo</a> <pre>Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=104568" name="attach_104568" title="alternative solution">attachment 104568</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=104568&action=edit" title="alternative solution">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=81699&attachment=104568'>[review]</a> alternative solution An alternative patch that would make the rectangular tessellator work also with empty boxes, so intrinsically safe also for other (future) callers. Obviously only valid if I understood what it's doing and it is possible to effectively ignore empty boxes. > Would it be ok with you if this test case were included with Cairo? Would the > following license header be suitable? Do you want some copyright notice to be > included? Which one? it is ok with me, it is suitable, don't want any copyright notice, whatever.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>