<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Segfault sweep_line_delete on video playback (2)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81699#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Segfault sweep_line_delete on video playback (2)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81699">bug 81699</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:henriqueleng@openmailbox.org" title="Henrique Lengler <henriqueleng@openmailbox.org>"> Henrique Lengler</a> <pre>Hi Massimo. Looks like you last patch with only 3 lines of code solved the problem! I applied here and no more segfault. How i don't understand and i know nothing about cairo, i don't know if what this patch do is the right thing or if is safe use it. All i know it is that it solved, i think. Should i mark as solved? I apllyied here and (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81699#c4">comment #4</a>) > Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=104568" name="attach_104568" title="alternative solution">attachment 104568</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=104568&action=edit" title="alternative solution">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=81699&attachment=104568'>[review]</a> [review] > alternative solution > > An alternative patch that would make the rectangular tessellator > work also with empty boxes, so intrinsically safe also for > other (future) callers. > > Obviously only valid if I understood what it's doing and it > is possible to effectively ignore empty boxes. > > > Would it be ok with you if this test case were included with Cairo? Would the > following license header be suitable? Do you want some copyright notice to be > included? Which one? > > it is ok with me, it is suitable, don't want any copyright notice, whatever.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>