<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:michael.haubenwallner@ssi-schaefer.com" title="Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner@ssi-schaefer.com>"> <span class="fn">Michael Haubenwallner</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - util/cairo-script: compilation errors on AIX (no member named '__jmpbuf')"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89339">bug 89339</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEEDINFO
</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - util/cairo-script: compilation errors on AIX (no member named '__jmpbuf')"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89339#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - util/cairo-script: compilation errors on AIX (no member named '__jmpbuf')"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89339">bug 89339</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:michael.haubenwallner@ssi-schaefer.com" title="Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner@ssi-schaefer.com>"> <span class="fn">Michael Haubenwallner</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Bryce Harrington from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89339#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> In studying <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - compilation errors on AIX (conflicting types for 'fgetpos64' ...)"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=89354">bug 89354</a>, and googling around for best practices in order of
> header inclusion, there seems to be a rough concensus[1] that you should
> include in this order:</span >
As long as "config.h" is included first, I don't really care which practice a
particular project does prefer.
<span class="quote">> But looking at the original problem, maybe header shuffling is the wrong way
> to solve this. The actual underlying problem here is a namespace conflict
> on jmpbuf. The _csi_scanner structure is not part of any public API, so how
> about just renaming the member to jump_buffer?</span >
Renaming is fine with me too.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>