<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Assertion "(_cairo_atomic_int_get (&(&surface->ref_count)->ref_count) > 0)"" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91967#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Assertion "(_cairo_atomic_int_get (&(&surface->ref_count)->ref_count) > 0)"" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91967">bug 91967</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:alberts.muktupavels@gmail.com" title="Alberts Muktupāvels <alberts.muktupavels@gmail.com>"> Alberts Muktupāvels</a> <pre>(In reply to Chris Wilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91967#c3">comment #3</a>) > You may have fixed a crash, but for _get_image_surface() to fail is nigh on > catastrophic (i.e. instead of a crash we now lose rendering). Did not understand... Is it wrong to set image to NULL when image->base is destroyed? It is recreated later. Anyway I have no idea how cairo works. That is why there was no patch from me. > About the only valid error I can think of is BadDrawable. Any idea how you > hit this failure path? No idea, but cairo should not try to free/destroy image->base twice.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>