<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Mask problem in pdf" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63302#c18">Comment # 18</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Mask problem in pdf" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63302">bug 63302</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:sixtysix@inwind.it" title="Massimo <sixtysix@inwind.it>"> Massimo</a> <pre>Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=118999" name="attach_118999" title="poppler quick hack">attachment 118999</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=118999&action=edit" title="poppler quick hack">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=63302&attachment=118999'>[review]</a> poppler quick hack This is a poppler quick hack that fixes the gimp issue The idea is to combine the image and the soft mask in image space (so with no resampling needed if they have the same dimensions) and then paint the result on the destination in destination space. I don't have the poppler test suite so I don't know how much it breaks, but firefox renders the output of my previous test case completely white and so I think poppler could do a better job as well. PS: in the function modified by the quick hack if one of the first two 'goto cleanup;' is executed 'maskPattern' is leaked.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>