<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/12/14, Carl Worth &lt;<a href="mailto:cworth@cworth.org">cworth@cworth.org</a>&gt;:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I just received a note pointing out this positive review of cairo,<br>(the reviewer found cairo to generate high-quality output *and* to be<br>fast). That&#39;s certainly an encouraging datapoint, (though maybe it was<br>
only compared to _really_ slow code, I don&#39;t know).<br><br>See below for details.<br><br>-Carl<br><br>From: &quot;eGore&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:eGore@gmx.de">eGore@gmx.de</a>&gt;<br>Subject: Cairo in PHP<br>To: <a href="mailto:cworth@cworth.org">
cworth@cworth.org</a><br>Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:28:38 +0100<br><br>Hi Carl,<br><br>not sure you are interested in an article that made some performance benchmark using cairo and gb. Anyway here you can find it:<br><br>
<a href="http://kore-nordmann.de/blog/comparision_of_php_image_libraries.html">http://kore-nordmann.de/blog/comparision_of_php_image_libraries.html</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div>Yes, cairo beats gd in polygon test. I did this test in my private work ( sorry I can&#39;t post it here ). 
<br><br>Another candidate is agg ( <a href="http://www.antigrain.com/">http://www.antigrain.com/</a> ) which is x6 - x8 times faster than cairo in polygon test.<br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Best Regards,<br>Nguyen Hung Vu
<br><a href="mailto:vuhung16plus{remove}@gmail.dot.com">vuhung16plus{remove}@gmail.dot.com</a><br>An inquisitive look at Harajuku <br><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vuhung/sets/72157600109218238/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/vuhung/sets/72157600109218238/
</a>