<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br></div><div>Just noticed that -unlike cairo- Cairomm is under the GPL license.</div><div><br></div><div>Is this truly intentional, since it will severely restrict use of the library.</div><div><br></div><div>Cairo website says:</div><div><br></div><div>"<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times; font-size: 16px; ">Cairo is <a href="http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/free-sw.html" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(76, 76, 230); ">free software</a> and is available to be redistributed and/or modified under the terms of either the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) version 2.1 or the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 1.1 at your option."</span></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Times" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Times" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; "><div>Cairomm web page says nothing about the license. Cairomm-1.6.4/COPYING lists the GPL 2.</div><div><br></div><div>If cairomm is GPL only, please mention it on the web page.</div></span></span></font></div></body></html>