[cairo-bugs] [Bug 5676] CAIROMM: Add bindings for more surface types

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to    
       
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.     
   
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5676          
     




------- Additional Comments From jonathon.jongsma at gmail.com  2006-01-22 01:47 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gtkmm&m=101515928306805&w=2
> So, for now, I'd like to remove the throw() specifications.

That sounds reasonable, I'll rework it to remove the exception specifications.

> Carl Worth has told us that it's probably a good idea to check the status after
> every call, in languages where that is viable.

ok.  Then I can easily put them back in.  There should be a fairly negligible
performance impact in any case since they're inlined, and there are only a
couple functions where it even applies.  

> I don't think that get_user_data() should be wrapped at all. It doesn't seem
> useful. I think I have documented that elsewhere. If we add it now, even
> protected, we can't remove it later.

I agree that it's not particularly useful at this point, but I didn't add these
functions.  They were previously wrapped in the public API, I just moved them to
protected.  Should I remove them altogether?  What are your expectations for API
stability for cairomm at this point?            
     
     
--           
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email         
     
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.