<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Assertion "(_cairo_atomic_int_get (&(&surface->ref_count)->ref_count) > 0)"" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91967#c31">Comment # 31</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Assertion "(_cairo_atomic_int_get (&(&surface->ref_count)->ref_count) > 0)"" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91967">bug 91967</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jskarvad@redhat.com" title="Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@redhat.com>"> Jaroslav Škarvada</a> <pre>(In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91967#c30">comment #30</a>) NP. The second patch is also more robust. Try the stress reproducer from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91967#c17">comment 17</a> and <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91967#c18">comment 18</a>, the "proposed fix" should withstand the test without crash at least. BTW I am still running the patched cairo on production machines without problem. I wonder what we did wrong. There is reproducer, analysis of the problem and patch.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>