<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Inkscape crashes with "Assertion failed", " ! surface->unbounded" when printing" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101833#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Inkscape crashes with "Assertion failed", " ! surface->unbounded" when printing" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101833">bug 101833</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:psychon@znc.in" title="Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>"> Uli Schlachter</a> <pre>Adrian, could you comment on this? I don't understand the attached patch nor <a href="https://cgit.freedesktop.org/cairo/commit/?id=90d50cd92315d6760069ad8062aba5e297370b20">https://cgit.freedesktop.org/cairo/commit/?id=90d50cd92315d6760069ad8062aba5e297370b20</a> __cairo_surface_is_recording checks if surface->backend->type is CAIRO_SURFACE_TYPE_RECORDING while both patches check surface->type instead. Why/how do we end up having recording surfaces which have a non-recording backend? Why does _cairo_surface_is_recording not recognize them? Wouldn't it be better to fix this function instead?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>