<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Incorrect code generation for atomic operations if HAVE_INTEL_ATOMIC_PRIMITIVES defined"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103559#c1">Comment # 1</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Incorrect code generation for atomic operations if HAVE_INTEL_ATOMIC_PRIMITIVES defined"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103559">bug 103559</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:psychon@znc.in" title="Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>"> <span class="fn">Uli Schlachter</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Quick comment that doesn't actually answer any question:
# define _cairo_atomic_int_get(x) (*x)
I think this needs to be a volatile read, at least. So, shouldn't
typedef int cairo_atomic_int_t;
instead use volatile int instead of int? I guess this might make this work
correctly, but I am not sure (I don't think I heard much about this intel
atomics before) and I certainly don't use this code anyway.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>