<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Incorrect code generation for atomic operations if HAVE_INTEL_ATOMIC_PRIMITIVES defined" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103559#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Incorrect code generation for atomic operations if HAVE_INTEL_ATOMIC_PRIMITIVES defined" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103559">bug 103559</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:ajohnson@redneon.com" title="Adrian Johnson <ajohnson@redneon.com>"> Adrian Johnson</a> <pre>(In reply to Bill Spitzak from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103559#c8">comment #8</a>) > Therefore calling these "GCC_LEGACY" is probably wrong. Why is it wrong? That is exactly what the gcc manual refers to them as: <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.2.0/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html#g_t_005f_005fsync-Builtins">https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.2.0/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html#g_t_005f_005fsync-Builtins</a> > I'm thinking they should be called "ICC" (the name of the Intel C > Compiler is ICC) We are talking about gcc builtins. Why would we call them "ICC"? > or maybe IIPsABI using the initial of the document title, > or some variation of that. The gcc manual says they should not be used for new code. So I don't see the point of coming up with any name other than something intended to discourage use of them like "legacy" or "obsolete".</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>