c99drn at cs.umu.se
Sun May 23 11:51:46 PDT 2004
On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 14:21 -0400, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2004 18:44:43 +0200, David Reveman wrote:
> > ok, there's no need for a meso-solo backend in glitz to get xserver
> > running on top of GL, then. xserver will have full glx and glitz will
> > use that, right?
> Isn't that backwards though?
> Keith's trying to get the X server to do all of its rendering through
> glitz. We don't want another X server under glitz then, hence mesa-solo.
That was the way I thought it would work, but when reading:
On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 07:51 -0700, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Once keithp gets xserver up on mesa-solo there will be no need to use
> miniglx anymore. You'll have full glx in the xserver.
I though that glx would be implemented on top of mesa-solo within
xserver and the xserver would then use glitz on top of this glx
but, I'm confused :P
which way is it?
More information about the cairo