[cairo] Re: cairomm API/ABI freeze?
Rick L Vinyard Jr
rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu
Fri Aug 18 08:49:36 PDT 2006
Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> What about the following?
> - retains a pretty close mapping to the C cairo functions
> - retains an obvious parallellism between the two functions
> - prefix 'begin_' makes it clear that we're not using 'new' in the C++
> - ?
> Thoughts? opinions? alternate suggestions?
Sounds good. The 'begin_new_' prefix removes the C++ new operator
confusion that I think 'new_' alone presents.
More information about the cairo