[cairo] Plans for 1.6?

[Carl Worth]

On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 00:11:55 +0000, Baz wrote:
> Actually one of the problems right now is that the /fallbacks/ fail
> the tests on quartz.
...
> Of course we want to reduce the use of fallbacks over time, but if the
> native rendering /and/ the fallbacks are broken we can't hope to
> render things correctly. So fixing this one is a priority; I don't
> think we have other fundamental problems.

Yes, that's definitely something keeping it from being marked as
supported. I hope you'll be able to get that fixed soon.

> As for the rest of the test suite... I'm loath to remove tests that
> might usefully show up a problem. However, it might be worth marking
> quartz as being a 'vector' surface in the boilerplate; those tests are
> currently ignoring antialiasing failures on the other backends, and
> quartz ignores those flags too.

And yeah, if cairo-quartz unconditionally does antialiasing, that
won't bother me at all.

-Carl
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/attachments/20071207/fd7877ca/attachment.pgp