[cairo] [RFC] Cairo operators expressed in shader syntax
Bill Spitzak
spitzak at thefoundry.co.uk
Tue May 15 12:33:24 EEST 2007
Daniel Amelang wrote:
> That's a lot closer to OVER than SOURCE, observe them side by side:
>
> ; OVER
> result = src * mask.a + dst * (1.0 - src.a * mask.a)
> ; cairo SOURCE
> result = src * mask.a + dst * (1.0 - mask.a)
>
> Hmmm...I wonder if the shader syntax isn't fully capturing all the
> differences. Looking at the cairo SOURCE, it seems awfully strange to
> combine a premultipied source image with a dest image w/out applying
> the other side of the multiplication. Perhaps this only useful when
> the source only has an alpha component?
No, the above SOURCE is how you have to write it so that the mask
actually means "things inside the mask get changed and things outside
don't". Earlier versions of Cairo did just "src*mask" and made it black
outside the mask, and everybody agreed that it was not at all what
anybody wanted or expected.
This is not as complicated as everybody is making out. ALL(*) cairo
operators are equivalent to:
(src OP dest) * mask + dest * (1-mask).
If you substitute the OP function you can use algebra and reduce or
manipulate the expression to look quite different, which gives rise to
your confusion. I think it is best to describe OP only, and then point
out that this mask is also done to all the results.
(*) Actually the "saturate" is not equivalent to this function. It
*looks* the same but the exact result when mask is a fraction is subtly
different in order to preserve the purpose of "saturate". It is best to
describe this as an exception, and point out how very close it is to the
same expression.
More information about the cairo
mailing list