[cairo] another pixman issue

Robert O'Callahan robert at ocallahan.org
Mon Mar 24 21:53:56 PDT 2008


On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org>
wrote:

> My intuition was that we should sample only the pixels that intersect the
> scaled-down target pixel, i.e. the rectangle (0,0)-(0.5,0.5). I guess
> there's probably a reason we don't do it that way, so OK.
>

Of course one reason is because if it worked that way, then bilinear
filtering wouldn't do anything when scaling up by integer scales. Duh.

Rob
-- 
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
53:5-6]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/attachments/20080325/f3c53fab/attachment.html 


More information about the cairo mailing list