[cairo] Bringing back the dead... RGB16_565

[Carl Worth]

On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 09:02 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:

> 	Meanwhile, Behdad has been doing some work to enable more compiler
> 	warnings and chasing down the bugs that are exposed by them. One
> 	interesting case is that adding -Wswitch-enum shows that the support
> 	for RGB16_565 was incomplete. For example, cairo_surface_write_to_png
> 	cannot work with a 16-bit format image, and there is missing support
> 	in some xlib backend paths with unknown consequences

Just for context, here's a link to the archived message where I wrote
that:

http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2006-August/007558.html

-Carl

PS. It sure is nice that that's simply the first result when using
google to search for "CAIRO_FORMAT_RGB16_565".
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/attachments/20090616/4a925ce3/attachment.pgp