[cairo] [PATCH, pixman] ARM NEON optimized pixman_blt & overlapped stuff

Koen Kooi k.kooi at student.utwente.nl
Wed Nov 18 09:55:48 PST 2009

On 18-11-09 17:41, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 November 2009, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> On 18-11-09 14:41, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
>>> Making real use of overlapped pixman_blt also requires patching xserver
>>> and the most simple way to do it is included in the attached test patch
>>> (not intended to be applied as-is).
>> How many kittens will get killed if I provide a pixman with overlapped
>> blit support and apply your patch to Xorg after that?
> Everything should work fine except that there will be no way for downgrading
> pixman. Patched xserver will show bad image artefacts on the use of overlapped
> blits when run with older unpatched versions of pixman.

Good, I have complete control over both when it comes to the 
buildsystem, so only people that manually tell the package manager to 
upgrade xorg but not pixman will get screwed.

> The other way around is always fine. Patches for pixman have no effect on
> interoperability with any versions of xserver.
>> I suspect overlapped blits will also benefit from a cached framebuffer
>> as well, right?
> Yes, at least for me the best type of 'non-3d-accelerated desktop' experience
> on OMAP3 devices can be achieved with write-through cached 16bpp framebuffer
> (and ShadowFB option explicitly disabled). But it still needs a few more NEON
> optimizations to address all the bottlenecks.

I've been thinking about enabling the caching when running on 3503/3505 
which have no iva or sgx. Fixing software to flush the cache properly 
would be better, but too many (slow moving) components are involved.



More information about the cairo mailing list