[cairo] patch [1/1] invert image in _cairo_gl_surrface_map_to_image
Henry Song
henry.song at samsung.com
Wed Jan 4 07:57:43 PST 2012
Hi, Andrea
The patch creates a dst of inv_image and the source is image, they are not
same, aren't they?
Thanks
Henry
-----Original Message-----
From: cairo-bounces+henry.song=samsung.com at cairographics.org
[mailto:cairo-bounces+henry.song=samsung.com at cairographics.org] On Behalf Of
Andrea Canciani
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:43 AM
To: Henry (Yu) Song - SISA
Cc: cairo at cairographics.org
Subject: Re: [cairo] patch [1/1] invert image in
_cairo_gl_surrface_map_to_image
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Henry (Yu) Song - SISA
<hsong at sisa.samsung.com> wrote:
> Date: Fri Dec 30 11:24:54 2011 -0800
>
> gl: Add support to invert non texture gl surface image that does not
have
> GL_MESA_pack_invert when map from gl surface to image surface
>
> diff --git a/src/cairo-gl-surface.c b/src/cairo-gl-surface.c
> index 8f69033..8b8f196 100644
>
> --- a/src/cairo-gl-surface.c
> +++ b/src/cairo-gl-surface.c
> @@ -1001,6 +1001,10 @@ _cairo_gl_surface_map_to_image (void
*abstract_surface,
> unsigned int cpp;
> cairo_bool_t invert;
> cairo_status_t status;
> + cairo_t *inv_cr = NULL;
> + cairo_image_surface_t *inv_image = NULL;
> + cairo_pattern_t *inv_pattern = NULL;
> + cairo_matrix_t inv_matrix;
>
> /* Want to use a switch statement here but the compiler gets whiny. */
> if (surface->base.content == CAIRO_CONTENT_COLOR_ALPHA) {
> @@ -1093,6 +1097,50 @@ _cairo_gl_surface_map_to_image (void
*abstract_surface,
> image = (cairo_image_surface_t *)
> _cairo_surface_create_in_error (status);
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * FIXME: we must invert the image if it is non texture surface,
> + * and it does not have GL_MESA_pack_invert.
> + * Is there more efficient way to invert image?
Using negative stride might be more efficient, but some backends might
not (yet) support them correctly.
Side note:
It is already possible to create negative stride images.
Should we add a test trying to use them and support them?
Unless I get feedback, I'll try to write the test this weekend.
> + */
> +
> + if (! _cairo_gl_surface_is_texture (surface) && ! invert) {
> + inv_image = (cairo_image_surface_t*)
> + _cairo_image_surface_create_with_pixman_format (NULL,
> + pixman_format,
> + extents->width,
> + extents->height,
> + -1);
> + if (unlikely (inv_image->base.status)) {
> + goto CLEAR_IMAGE;
> + }
> +
> + image->base.is_clear = FALSE;
> + inv_pattern = cairo_pattern_create_for_surface (&image->base);
> + if (unlikely (inv_pattern->status)) {
> + goto CLEAR_PATTERN;
> + }
> + cairo_matrix_init_scale (&inv_matrix, 1.0, -1.0);
> + cairo_matrix_translate (&inv_matrix, 0, -(extents->height));
> + cairo_pattern_set_matrix (inv_pattern, &inv_matrix);
> +
> + inv_cr = cairo_create (&inv_image->base);
> + if (unlikely (inv_cr->status)) {
> + goto CLEAR_CAIRO;
> + }
> + cairo_set_source (inv_cr, inv_pattern);
> + cairo_set_operator (inv_cr, CAIRO_OPERATOR_SOURCE);
> + cairo_paint (inv_cr);
You're using the same surface as source and as destination.
This results in undefined behavior.
If you want to flip the image like this, you should use two independent
surfaces
> + cairo_surface_destroy (&image->base);
> + image = (cairo_image_surface_t *)cairo_surface_reference
(&inv_image->base);
> + }
> +
> +CLEAR_CAIRO:
> + cairo_destroy (inv_cr);
> +CLEAR_PATTERN:
> + cairo_pattern_destroy (inv_pattern);
> +CLEAR_IMAGE:
> + cairo_surface_destroy (&inv_image->base);
>
> return &image->base;
> }
> --
> cairo mailing list
> cairo at cairographics.org
> http://lists.cairographics.org/mailman/listinfo/cairo
--
cairo mailing list
cairo at cairographics.org
http://lists.cairographics.org/mailman/listinfo/cairo
More information about the cairo
mailing list