On 14-01-16 10:12 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On 14-01-16 01:48 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: >> Does this one look better? > > It was brought to my attention that the real fix is much simpler: > > if (path->needs_move_to && path->has_current_point) > ... Test and fix pushed to master. -- behdad http://behdad.org/