[cairo] [PATCH 0/7] Bunch of distcheck fixes
psychon at znc.in
Fri Mar 14 08:00:52 PDT 2014
On 14.03.2014 02:17, Bryce W. Harrington wrote:
> Looks like the attachment was too large for the mailing list.
> I've posted it here instead:
> # Test case changes since 1.12.8:
I took a look at this. This resulted in the two patches that I already send. My
other observations are for someone else to figure out (and I won't touch ref
test-fallback: clip-fill clip-stroke-unbounded clip-twice hatchings random-clip
bisects to 7b80613d6d483cdfd5d0c6311de0f8586092b408, ref images need to be
PASS -> FAIL # world-map-fill.xlib-render-0_0.rgb24
Can't reproduce, video driver bug?
image16: world-map-fill paint-source-alpha paint-with-alpha record-paint-alpha
Bisects to 98fef3cef2d0f7f463a2e4f9f1b35b09f7b6ea77, ref images need to be
FAIL -> XFAIL # bug-seams.image.argb32
This change is caused by the following commit (which doesn't explain why a
previously-good ref image is suddenly bad, Chris?)
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Thu Jul 4 09:40:37 2013 +0100
test: Add a few reference images found lurking on my machine
PASS -> FAIL # record-fill-alpha.image16.rgb24
Bisects to 8cfbdf2f02ba01d5638a91c9f3f7fc228b402caa, dunno, I'd propose a new
PASS -> FAIL # record-paint-alpha-clip-mask.image16.rgb24
Bisects to c986a7310bb06582b7d8a566d5f007ba4e5e75bf, dunno, I'd propose a new
PASS -> FAIL # device-offset-scale.image.argb32
PASS -> FAIL # large-source-roi.image.argb32
PASS -> FAIL # surface-pattern-big-scale-down.image.argb32
PASS -> FAIL # surface-pattern-scale-down-extend-none.image.argb32
PASS -> FAIL # surface-pattern-scale-down-extend-pad.image.argb32
PASS -> FAIL # surface-pattern-scale-down-extend-reflect.image.argb32
PASS -> FAIL # surface-pattern-scale-down-extend-repeat.image.argb32
PASS -> FAIL # surface-pattern-scale-down.image.argb32
Bisects to fb57ea13e04d82866cbc8e86c83261148bb3e231, definitely a regression for
large-source-roi, the others might need new ref images
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 01:04:13AM +0000, Bryce W. Harrington wrote:
>> I've gone ahead and pushed patches 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 from this series to
>> Patch 4 I modified as suggested by Uri and pushed, to indicate skia has
>> been in the codebase since 1.10 rather than 1.12.
>> Patch 5 I dropped and used Uri's alternate fix instead, after checking
>> that it resolves the gtk-doc issues.
No idea who this Uri is, but thanks!
>> As mentioned below, there is still some minor cruft in distcheck, but
>> nothing IMHO that is worth holding up the release for. However, tests
>> are in a poor shape right now.
>> I ran 'make check' comparisons between the 1.12.8 release (as tagged in
>> git), and master HEAD from earlier today:
>> 1.12.8 HEAD
>> Tests run: 22751 24838
>> Passed: 15809 15881
>> Failed: 4198 5385
>> Expected Failed: 405 330
>> Error: 1 1
>> Crashed: 227 1018
>> Untested: 2111 2223
>> Total: 22751 24838
>> I've attached a listing of the test cases that changed their results.
>> Failures seem to be rather across the board, although there does seem to
>> be a lot relating to clipping/masking and transform/scaling.
How did you generate the (not-)attached list? I'm curious...
"For saving the Earth.. and eating cheesecake!"
More information about the cairo