[cairo] ANN: "Caskbench" performance benchmark
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Sat Sep 27 02:23:34 PDT 2014
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:38:16PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:01:25PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > Apart from the stars test, cairo-gl did better all-around than cairo
> > image. And for gradients and image manipulation it's profoundly faster.
> > Now, I haven't tested against GLX but this makes me wonder if this would
> > translate into significantly better performance for, say, Inkscape? If
> > so, should we maybe be advocating cairo-gl/cairo-egl more heavily here?
>
> I notice you don't actually synchronise the rendering pipeline before
> measuring the throughput performance. That would be worth checking.
To illustrate that point:
=0 ickle:/usr/src/caskbench$ ./src/caskbench -t egl
cairo-animation 100 PASS 100 9999
cairo-bubbles 100 PASS 100 9999 0.00%
cairo-circle 100 PASS 100 9999
cairo-clip 100 PASS 100 9999 0.00%
cairo-cubic 100 PASS 100 9999
cairo-curves 100 PASS 100 2791 0.00%
cairo-fill 100 PASS 100 9999
...
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the cairo
mailing list