[cairo] openvg still used ?
dave.r.yeo at gmail.com
Thu Aug 18 04:27:46 UTC 2016
On 08/16/16 10:25 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:12:56PM -0700, Dave Yeo wrote:
>> On 08/12/16 10:41 PM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
>>> On 12.08.2016 22:59, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>>>> I don't know much about OpenVG but you're right it doesn't appear to
>>>> have really caught on generally; I'm not spotting any users of the Cairo
>>>> OpenVG backend either. I wouldn't mind seeing us drop it and give more
>>>> focus to OpenGLES...
>>> Maybe we should move them to separate packages.
>> Git history will preserve it.
> Yes, that's a good point that it'll always be there for posterity via
> the git history, although obviously it won't be preserved in a way
> that's likely to be at all usable (maybe not even recoverable). So if
> we drop OpenVG, I do think we need to think of it as a irrevocable
I've recovered a few projects from history, depending on the speed the
project changes, it can be simply reversing some patches and rebasing
and it at least gives a good starting point.
>> Be polite to remove with one patch and document it.
> Do you mean, do the entire removal by a single patch, that also adds
> documentation to e.g. the README? Or do you just mean explain the
> rationale for the deletion in the changelog entry?
I should have said a minimum of patches as sometimes it's best to split
The changelog should be good enough documentation.
> Also, are you favoring only the OpenVG deletion or both it and the Skia
To be honest, I don't have an opinion on actual deletion besides hating
to see deletion but realizing unmaintained code rots and should be pruned.
I use the OS/2 backend and lurk here in case a discussion such as this
comes up. It's a shame that there aren't any OpenVG or Skia people here
to put in there 2 cents
More information about the cairo