[cairo] [PATCH 23/72] drm: fixed cairo_status_t vs cairo_int_status_t mixup

[Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult]

On 15.01.2016 21:34, Bryce Harrington wrote:

> I'm sure this one is fine, but to save me the time of looking up why
> it's different could you explain why this is wrong?

The functions called here are returning cairo_int_status_t, instead of
cairo_status_t.

--mtx

--
Enrico Weigelt,
metux IT consulting
+49-151-27565287