[cairo] cacheable image representation now on a branch
Jeff Muizelaar
jeff at infidigm.net
Sat Dec 13 08:51:45 PST 2008
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 09:11:56AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> But the large-source test only uses a 20x20 source - surely Quartz is
> not failing to allocate that! Oh I think I see the issue - it attempts
> to make a CGImage large enough to accommodate the whole image and not
> just cover the region of interest - shame on Quartz for having such
> small image surfaces! (However CAIRO_STATUS_SURFACE_TOO_BIG sounds like
> a good idea and would clarify a few errors which are currently
> mis-reported as NO_MEMORY.)
I agree.
-Jeff
More information about the cairo
mailing list