[cairo] Pushing vmx patches in pixman

[Soeren Sandmann]

Luca Barbato <lu_zero at gentoo.org> writes:

> > Finally, I'd still like to see the fbByteMul() macros being generated
> > into their own header file, and then #included in both
> > pixman-combine{32,64}.c and pixman-vmx.c.
> 
> There are some definitions duplicated in the sources, should I replace 
> them as well?

Which ones are those?  Generally, yes, the less duplication the
better.


Thanks,
Soren