[cairo] Pushing vmx patches in pixman

[Luca Barbato]

Soeren Sandmann wrote:
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero at gentoo.org> writes:
> 
>>> Finally, I'd still like to see the fbByteMul() macros being generated
>>> into their own header file, and then #included in both
>>> pixman-combine{32,64}.c and pixman-vmx.c.
>> There are some definitions duplicated in the sources, should I replace 
>> them as well?
> 
> Which ones are those? 

right now I found #define Alpha(x) ((x) >> 24)
possibly there is more.

> Generally, yes, the less duplication the better.

I pushed the initial split and it's usage in pixman-vmx.c. If it looks 
ok I'll move changing the rest.

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero